Porter's Five Forces Analysis Dashboard

Comprehensive competitive analysis framework for strategic business insights

Framework Overview

Porter's Five Forces is a strategic analysis framework developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 to evaluate the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry. This model helps businesses understand the competitive forces that shape their industry and develop strategies to gain competitive advantage.

Who Uses It

  • • Strategic consultants
  • • Business executives
  • • Investment analysts
  • • MBA students

Key Benefits

  • • Industry structure analysis
  • • Competitive positioning
  • • Strategic planning
  • • Investment decisions

Industry Attractiveness Score

7.2
out of 10

High attractiveness indicates favorable industry conditions

Interactive Five Forces Analysis

8.5
6.2
5.8
4.3
7.1
Industry
Position

Competitive Rivalry

Market competition intensity

8.5
High
Number of competitors
Market growth rate
Product differentiation

High rivalry due to numerous established competitors and slow market growth

Supplier Power

Supplier bargaining strength

7.1
Medium-High
Supplier concentration
Switching costs
Input importance

Limited suppliers for critical components increase their bargaining power

Buyer Power

Customer bargaining strength

6.2
Medium
Buyer concentration
Price sensitivity
Brand loyalty

Moderate buyer power with some price sensitivity but reasonable brand loyalty

Threat of Substitutes

Alternative product availability

5.8
Medium
Substitute availability
Performance ratio
Switching costs

Moderate substitute threat with emerging technologies providing alternatives

Threat of New Entry

Market entry barriers

4.3
Low-Medium
Capital requirements
Regulatory barriers
Brand recognition

High barriers to entry due to capital requirements and established brand recognition

Historical Context

Framework development

1979 - Framework Introduction
Michael E. Porter introduces the Five Forces model in Harvard Business Review
1980 - Book Publication
"Competitive Strategy" book expands on the framework
Present - Widespread Adoption
Used globally by consultants, executives, and business schools

Industry Comparison

Force Trends Over Time

How to Use Porter's Five Forces Analysis

1

Identify Industry Scope

  • • Define your specific industry
  • • Determine geographic boundaries
  • • Identify key players and stakeholders
2

Gather Information

  • • Collect market data
  • • Research competitors
  • • Analyze industry trends
3

Analyze Each Force

  • • Evaluate competitive rivalry
  • • Assess supplier power
  • • Measure buyer influence
  • • Review substitute threats
  • • Examine entry barriers
4

Score and Rate

  • • Rate each force (1-10)
  • • Document key factors
  • • Compare with benchmarks
5

Develop Strategy

  • • Identify opportunities
  • • Address weaknesses
  • • Create action plans
  • • Set strategic priorities
6

Monitor & Update

  • • Review periodically
  • • Track industry changes
  • • Update analysis
  • • Adjust strategies

Advantages

Comprehensive Analysis
Provides holistic view of competitive landscape
Strategic Planning
Helps identify strategic opportunities and threats
Industry Attractiveness
Evaluates profit potential of different industries
Widely Accepted
Recognized framework in business education and practice

Disadvantages

Static Analysis
Doesn't capture dynamic market changes effectively
Subjective Scoring
Relies on subjective judgment for force assessment
Limited Innovation Focus
May not adequately address disruptive innovations
Complexity Reduction
Oversimplifies complex competitive dynamics

Key Insights & Strategic Recommendations

Primary Insight

High competitive rivalry and supplier power are the dominant forces affecting industry profitability. Focus on differentiation strategies to reduce price competition.

Strategic Focus

Develop supplier partnerships and vertical integration opportunities to reduce supplier power. Invest in customer loyalty programs to strengthen buyer relationships.

Defensive Strategy

Maintain high barriers to entry through continued innovation and brand building. Monitor substitute technologies for early threat detection.